On the other hand, the TCP camp also has a phrase for OSI people.
There are lots of phrases. My favorite is `nitwit' -- and the
rationale is the Internet philosophy has always been you have
extremely bright, non-partisan researchers look at a topic, do
world-class research, do several competing implementations, have
a bake-off, determine what works best, write it down and make
that the standard. The OSI view is entirely opposite. You take
written contributions from a much larger community, you put the
contributions in a room of committee people with, quite honestly,
vast political differences and all with their own political axes
to grind, and four years later you get something out, usually
without it ever having been implemented once. So the Internet
perspective is implement it, make it work well, then write it
down, whereas the OSI perspective is to agree on it, write it
down, circulate it a lot and now we'll see if anyone can
implement it after it's an international standard and every
vendor in the world is committed to it. One of those processes is
backwards, and I don't think it takes a Lucasian professor of
physics at Oxford to figure out which.
 -- Marshall Rose, "The Pied Piper of OSI"